Source favicon22:22 罪恶之城(Sin City) » Andy's blog

刚看完,非常过瘾!超级暴力但绝对不血腥!好像《低俗小说》,也像《杀死比尔》,Quentin只是挂个名?

《罪恶之城》由Frank Miller的小说改编而成。影片讲述的故事都发生在一个虚构的城市:罪恶之城。在这座被暴力所摧残的城市中,警察已经被黑帮所腐化。影片将有三条故事主线,最主要的角色是暴力警察Marv,因为一个与他有过一夜情的漂亮女人死于因他而起的复仇,他准备在这个城市里大开杀戒……

Source favicon20:53 广告时间:寻找足球Blogger » 未完成 - Incomplete
虽然因为种种原因,近年来足球看得越看越少,已经逐渐沦落成了一名伪球迷,就像在世界杯和欧洲杯期间才突然冒出来的那些球迷一样:)。不过有机会还是会认真地看看球赛和天下足球这样的节目的,也很希望能够有一些优秀的足球Blog。 滞销书的Calon近日建了个足球的团队Blog,正在寻找热心足球的Blogger加盟,在这里帮他广告一下。 新开一个 blog 是因为,一来我的“意识裸奔流”从来都没什么章法,绝对不可能在自己的 blog 上单单围绕足球来做文章,二来个人精力有限,恐怕不可能做到既有数量又有质量,第三则是个人的意见难免有偏见,多几个人不但可以有效地中和,还能够在切磋中提高水平,最后,不同于足球论坛的是,团队 blog 没那么人多嘴杂,氛围应该会比较好。
Source favicon20:19 Gizmo Project – Skype’s new competitor » Tim Yang's Geek Blog

I’ve been playing with the new Gizmoproject.com. It’s a Skype-type VOIP software available for both Mac and Windows that pretty much has the same features.

Source favicon19:25 we rolling » del.icio.us
Many blogging platforms work well with del.icio.us. But if you are looking for a really simple way to have your latest del.icio.us bookmarks displayed as part of your website, you might want to try our linkrolls. Using it is as...
Source favicon18:31 小休通告 » Jan's Tech Blog
由於今晚進行伺服器搬遷工程,所以Jan's Tech Blog會暫停服務。因為要轉換IP,對於某些用戶,可能有幾天不能連線。特此通告。 (P.S. 各Spammer,今晚開始你們也可以集中資源Spam其他人的Blog,因為這Blog將會離線。)...
Source favicon16:05 Beijing Media Top Stories: cadres exchange, Bangladesh blasts and blood donation ... » Danwei RSS 1.0
BT050818S.jpg
Beijing Times' cover, features a picture of police in Bangladesh.

1. Taiwan's Kuomintang (KMT) party to make party-to-party cadre exchanges with the Communist Party of China (CPC) beginning at the end of August;

2. About 350 small bombs exploded within an hour of each other across Bangladesh, killing two people and injuring more than 100 in an unprecedented attack initially linked to banned Islamic extremists;

3. Daxing county abolished compulsory blood donation by quota in Beijing (voluntary blood donation has already satisfied the needs of the county);

4. Insurance on serious diseases for workers to be implemented;

5. Twenty travel spots in Miyun county re-opened today (they had been closed because of road collapse)

Source favicon15:38 Blog排行是“乱”还是“百花齐放”? » 未完成 - Incomplete
我昨天认为“Blog的排名现在有点乱”的观点,Zheng不是太赞同,他觉得“我倒是认为这样的百花齐放应该更多。因为排行可以有不同的角度,反应不同的情况”。百花齐放我是赞同的,但我的感觉是现在出现的这几个Blog排行,他们基本上都是依据反向链接的数目作为排行的依据,但大家得到的排行依据(链接数目)却有很大的区别,所以才显得乱。 Zheng比较详细地说明了目前主要的几种Blog排名方式,包括Feedster/Technorati,Blogrolling,Bloglines,Pubsub和Blogpulse。其中除了Bloglines的订阅排行外,其余的排名依据都是链接数目,只是大家的取样范围和爬虫的能力不同。 Feedster与Technorati是最为类似的,但双方的数据已经有很大的差异,看zheng昨天的文章或者是去详细比较他们的排名榜都可以清楚地了解这一点。本来想用Bloglines的citations功能比较一下这两个排行榜前几名的blog在bloglines中的结果,但bloglines的反向链接搜索功能现在用不了,不过按照以前zheng等人的比较,估计真要按照bloglins的结果来作个排行榜,结果又会有不同。Icerocket不久前也推出了反向链接搜索功能,估计在不久以后他们也会有自己的基于反向链接的Blog排行榜,会不会让局面更乱,到时候也可以看看。 Pubsub的Linkranks与Bloglines toplinks同样都是依据来自blog的反向链接作排名,但因为Pubsub的排名是依据域名,而Bloglines是根据某个具体的URL,因此结果差异巨大,二者之间没有直接的可比性,可以看作是两个不同的产品。但从这两个排名都可以发现,在榜上位居前列的有不少是传统的媒体网站,比如NY Times,Washingtong Post,BBC等,也就是他们在取样上并不是限定于Blog中的链接,因此并不能算是个严格意义上的Blog排行榜。 我倒是比较喜欢Blogpulse的这个profile功能(可能是因为只有在这里才能够查到我的blog的排名吧^_^),一方面它只考虑最近30天的数据,但又不像Pubsub那样只取一天的数据,更可能反映出blog的动态变化,二来它区分了来自排名较高的blog的链接,而且还有变动的趋势图可以看。 Blog排名的算法当然最好能够百花齐放,既有依据反向链接的排名,也有依据订阅量的排名,还可以有每日的话题排名(就类似现在的Pubsub或者bloglines的toplinks),或者是综合排名,这样多种多样的排行榜才会更有看头,也更有意思。不过目前的情况的确有点乱,我也并不指望Feedster和Technorati的排名会基本上完全一样,毕竟不同的搜索引擎总有不同的强项,就算是Google和Yahoo的搜索结果还存在差异,只是大家现在的产品总给人一种不太成熟的感觉。但乱总是新产品在创新和发展中的必经阶段,至少“乱”总比“没有”要好得多。 Update: 刚才看到这篇Blog,的确现在的排行榜都太综合了,没有分类的排行榜的价值始终有限。
Source favicon15:07 Shooting up on the Silk Road: a diabetic cycles Beijing to London for charity » Danwei RSS 1.0
diabetes_cycle.jpg

Cycling is not the easiest way to get from beijing to London, especially if you are a diabetic. Mad dogs and Englishmen...
Two Brits headed west from Beijing on August 14 on bicycles. They are cycling all the way to London in order to raise £10,000 for Diabetes UK. Their ride will take them through northwestern China, Pakistan, Iran, Turkey and eventually across Europe and back home to London.
Andy Clapperton and Jon Smith have both been teaching in universities in Beijing, and having enjoyed other cycling expeditions around China, decided to set themselves a somewhat larger challenge. Andy is himself a diabetic, and this makes the load considerably heavier as they will be carrying large supplies of insulin in cool boxes on the back of the bikes.


Andy comments that 'besides raising money, the aim of the expedition is also to promote the ethos that diabetes shouldn't stop anyone achieving any goal they set their minds to. I feel there are a lot of misunderstandings about diabetes, and this is something we would like to try and challenge, particularly given the increasing number of people affected by the condition'.


For more information about the route and how to donate or sponsor, as well as the latest updates on their whereabouts and a range of excellent photos from across China, check out their website: cyclehome.net

Source favicon12:57 昨夜·讨论·难产 » Xerdoc Together
昨天跟吉子从11点聊到了凌晨2点左右,一直在讨论突然想出的一个想法,最后不幸难产,事实证明是同43things相类似的概念,起初我俩都不是很了解43things的具体操作方法,只是知道类似于一个许愿池的地方,呵呵,讨论之后,吉子上网重新看了看,发现同43things和中文的爱米网在想法上有很大重合的地方。隧宣告难产,而已经睡觉的Xuer被我俩吵醒,觉得我们说得很有意思嚷着要我帮她在爱米网搞个帐户之类的东西,被我严辞拒绝,郁闷睡觉去。当然睡觉中产生了另外的想法,这为后话,目前还在Xerdoc内部讨论,如果还是难产,再给大家来个剖腹展示,由众人评述去吧。 反正也是难产,就分享给大家,说不定会有点启发,说不定也能变个标本之类的东西,呵呵。 想法是这样产生的,我在听BaseCamp领导人在最近的一次峰会上谈论Rails和BaseCamp等等,又想到最近有朋友受到结婚困扰,就想,如果我定一个筹办婚礼或者结婚的计划并发布出来,里面有制定的Schedule以及里程碑,用工程管理的方法来管理我生活中的计划,期间还有别的用户给我的意见批评表扬,虽然这是我婚礼的计划,不过n多热心人都参乎进来,计划一步步的做,成功,放出婚礼录像Podcasting之,大家都Happy。这样,iPlan的雏形就是这样出现了; 又想到,最近有同事家里要添小宝宝了,这肯定没法计划,因为肯定要发生。不过关注的还是这样的一个过程,哪天哪天要去海妇检查,哪天哪天要去参加助产课程……(我好像挺内行,呵呵) 又想到,买房,计划两年内买房,真是漫长啊,别的用户会不会那么热情帮助那,或者是否还有激情继续分享这个漫长的过程呢,先不管这个,关注的还是这样的过程…… 又想到,Xuer最近健身,要达到一个什么目标呢,去的哪家健身馆呢(啪,Sidebar中出现了各大健身馆的RSS广告,呵呵,停,过了) 此时,43things还没有走到脑袋中,只顾着自己意淫了。 于是觉得iPlan计划性太强,不过还是刺激人们坐下去和写下去的一种手段,其实,据心理学家分析,如果一个人把自己的目标同别人分享出来后,就会很不好意思不去做了,比如我早期说戒烟的时候,宣布出来之后,确实很不好意思,不过后来脸皮厚了,然后也没人理我了,戒烟的宣告贴到宿舍楼大厅都不会觉得害臊的(又过了,停)。iPlan的计划性太强,所以改名叫iDoing,记录正在作的事情,过程是故事的线索,会是 目标(包括不可避免的,比如生孩子)——计划——过程——结果(不一定都有结果,不过会被大家笑) 觉得目前为止,想法还算可以,于是叫来吉子讨论。未等我陈述完,吉子就问这个跟43things有什么区别,我说43things关注的是你想做的事情,iDoing关注的是做事情的过程,而且有很强的计划性,是吧。吉子说他也不是很了解43things就是简单看了看。于是继续陈述,期间也是遇到好多问题,比如 这样的一个功能基本就包括了一个BSP要提供的东西,成本太大,搞不过大的提供商,如果能够类似Technorati那样刺激用户从他的Blog上ping过来还可能一些; 定自己的计划是一方面,看别人的计划可以得到更大的帮助,比如完全可以参照别人的婚礼计划……,不过这种搜索系统跟iAsk又有什么区别呢。iAsk往往要招募一些回答问题的专家来做编辑吧(不是很清楚,偶尔看过),这个数据完全是用户个人经历的记录和分享; 人家是不是很愿意分享自己的过程啊?记得前阵子在The Web We Web上看到过一篇文章,讨论了一个RoR的项目。 MICHEAL BUFFINGTON最近用RUBY ON RAILS创造了一个非常有意思和商业前景的网站:WORDPHOTO.ORG,和FLICKR一样,它是一个图片分享的社会性网络,但它采用了和FLICKR完全相反的信息组织方法:FLICKR是在上传图片后给图片打上标签,从而形成一个信息网络,而WORDPHOTO是先写下一个标签,然后接受成员为这个标签(标题)而绞尽脑汁创作出来的图片,这也就是一次“命题作文”的过程,在这个过程中,参与者可以深切的体会到人类的创造力是如此深远各异,从而得到最大的学习启发,或者仅仅是审美愉悦。 当时记忆比较深刻的就是这种命题作文的创作方式,那么先定了计划然后去完成,也属于这样的一种模式吧。 谈到了深夜,几乎没有什么问题了。Xuer也被我俩吵醒跑过来听着,似乎对其中减肥的计划比较热心。“再看看43things。”吉子重新看了看43things,以及爱米网,发现想法重合的部分太多了,他们当然会提供过程的分享,会提供完成者的体验…… 唉,从想法方面没有什么好说的了,不过看了看爱米网,跟吉子大致看了看用户群以及参与度,黏性啊什么的。又是这个老问题了,推广作的不好,我们本以为买房会是最大的一件事情,结果找了半天才找到,呵呵 对比一下想法吧,我觉得iPlan/iDoing比较好的一点就是计划性,类似于命题作文的创作模式,而且关注的是过程的趣味性而不是想法的趣味性,可能都是那些想法,可是每个人买房的过程都不一样,这个虽然是处理和操作的环节,不过处理好了也是运作起来的特性之一吧,呵呵。 另外一点体会就是用户长期写Blog的针对性不是很强,经常看到朋友的Blog或者Space很久不更新,或者用歌词充数,但是用户对于一件事情的专注力应该是很强的吧,呵呵。 这两点都没有经过调查就说的,应该是比较主观的,各位看客也可以说说自己的想法和需求。 在这个想法上,Xerdoc目前是没有打算做这个事情,各位有意的话可以随意利用上述想法,也欢迎大家一起对这个想法交流意见,呵呵,虽然现在看来已经没有多大意义,毕竟43things都已经证明这个是可以操作的了,呵呵。 BTW:本来昨晚一直讨论,一直给内部发信说这个想法,不过也是让CCoffee失望了,在此对此次医疗事故表示道歉,愿意赔送白朗姆一瓶,呵呵。 你丫,一口气读下来,心潮澎湃,不料最后坠机了,日! CCoffee~ Tags: Other, Tech, 43things Tags: , ,
Source favicon11:45 Courts signal that Google's keyword policy is lawful » Google Blog




There have been a few erroneous reports suggesting that a judge ruled against Google in a case involving GEICO. It's actually the reverse of that, so we thought we'd clarify a few things about that decision.



Last December, the judge in the case ruled decisively in our favor on the issue of keywords. In her oral ruling, she stated that GEICO had failed to prove that using "GEICO" as a keyword to trigger ads was likely to confuse consumers. Then, earlier this month, she issued a written ruling explaining the reasoning behind the December ruling.



In her written ruling, she stated that GEICO's own evidence "refutes the allegation that the use of the trademark as a keyword, without more, causes a likelihood of confusion." That is a clear signal that Google's policy on trademarks and keywords is lawful.



What has generated the confusion is another part of the ruling, of little significance to Google, that relates to the use of "GEICO" in ad text. Google already has a policy that prohibits advertisers from using someone else's trademark in their ad text when the trademark owner objects. Our policy on that is here.



It's been our longstanding policy -- dating back to well before GEICO filed its lawsuit against us -- to block use of a trademark in ad text when the trademark owner objects. GEICO said that there were instances when their trademark appeared in competitors' ads even after GEICO objected. In her December oral ruling, the judge called this a "narrow issue," and said that Google and GEICO should "see whether or not there can be a resolution of what is left in the case." In the recent written decision, she reiterated these points, and explained that while she thought that the ads with "GEICO" in the ad text were confusing, she hadn't decided whether Google was liable for that.



Judge Brinkema's decision is consistent with several other court opinions. A court in Austria recently ruled in our favor, concluding that the use of a trademark to trigger ads isn't likely to confuse consumers. A German court has also ruled in our favor on this issue. And in a case not involving Google, a federal appeals court in the United States recently reached the same result in a keyword-triggered ad case.



We're very pleased with Judge Brinkema's decision, which tracks our AdWords trademark policy. The decision is a victory for consumers.



Finally, even though we believe our current policy strikes a good balance between advertisers, users and trademark owners, don't be surprised if our policy evolves over time. We believe it is possible for an advertiser to create an ad that uses a trademark in a legal and non-confusing way - after all that is what comparative advertising is all about.
Source favicon11:21 Skype spam » Andy's blog

FLG真是与时俱进啊。

Source favicon10:55 Microsoft Leadership Forum » Jan's Tech Blog
Microsoft邀請了多個業界名人,出席他們的Leadership Forum。我們可以透過Live Meeting來參與其中。...
Source favicon10:42 Xinhua: Famous scientist slams academic corruption » Danwei RSS 1.0
yau.jpg
Mathematician Yau Shing-Tung

Xinhua reports:
If academic corruption in China can not be curbed, scientific and technological development in the country will be delayed by 20 years, world-known mathematician Shing-Tung Yau warned recently.

Yau, who is the only Chinese American winner of the Fields Medal, lashed out at rampant plagiarism in Chinese academia in an interview by a Beijing newspaper.

Improving research quality and curbing violations of academic ethics is critical, he said.

Yau, a professor at Harvard University, has many contacts with Chinese students and researchers and pays close attention to the training of mathematicians in China.

He said the papers of some members of China's Academy of Sciences are not even up to the level of Harvard undergraduates.

Many professors in Chinese universities prize the quantity of papers, while neglecting significant research. They even restrict talented students from conducting independent research by demanding their assistance in writing their own articles, said Yau...

...He mentioned that a Chinese student of his at Harvard plagiarized another professor's article. Yet when the student went back to China, he became a member of the Chinese Academy of Sciences and was put in charge of a science foundation. His salary was became 20 times that of other young researchers though his true expertise was far inferior.

Yau said China's mathematical research was close to the top level in the world before the Cultural Revolution in the 1960s, when much of academia was purged in the campaign for ideological purity.

With the rapid economic development in today's China, better achievements should be made by academia, he said.

"Chinese students are talented. They can have great achievement if led by good teachers and doing research in a healthy academic environment," he said.

Plagiarism is one of the chronic illnesses in Chinese academia. Several such cases of it involving recognized scholars have been uncovered in recent years.

Links and Sources
Source favicon09:20 Steam Cleaning Vacuum Recommendation Needed » Jeremy Zawodny's blog
Our random for sale and recommendations email list at work has failed me, so I appeal to the wisdom of my blog readers on this one... I'm looking for a decent little steam cleaning vacuum that I can use for spot cleaning my carpet (spills, pet stains, etc). This is not intended for cleaning whole rooms or anything like that. Any recommendations? (Aside from "don't get light carpet, dumbass...")...
Source favicon08:57 Excel Spreadsheet that lets you check out jobs postings at work » Tim Yang's Geek Blog

This is a really nifty lifehack I found via Tipmonkies. Work Magazine has created an Excel spreadsheet that lets you sneakily check out jobs databases at work from an interface that looks like, no actually it IS, an Excel spreadsheet.

It’s a real Excel 2000 spreadsheet that plugs into Indeed.

Source favicon06:22 远程分享工具:FolderShare » WebLeOn's Blog
FolderShare

远程控制计算机的软件枚不胜举,FolderShare也是一个具有文件的远程管理、分享及搜索功能的工具。



FolderShare的特点是其远程控制过程可以浏览器中完成,并不需要安装任何软件。注册账号并登录后,就可以在线管理一个或者多个主机。功能包括读取主机目录、分享特定目录、管理用户读写权限、下载自己主机的文件等等,可谓非常强大。FolderShare主机端的监控程序也非常小巧。Windows版本的仅有800多K,Mac版本的也只有1.3M左右。



更加让人高兴的是,我觉得最实用的两个桌面搜索程序Google Desktop SearchMSN Search Toolbar都对FolderShare有非常好的支持,让你能够利用强大的Desktop Search更快的搜索到远程计算机上的文件。
Source favicon05:05 Technologies du Langage: Yahoo: Pages manquantes? (2) Yahoo/Google索引量大战 » del.icio.us/chedong
用babelfish http://babelfish.altavista.com/babelfish/tr 看了一下英文版 讲的还是很有道理的
Source favicon04:52 A Comparison of the Size of the Yahoo and Google Indices » del.icio.us/chedong
通过随即选取和组合一些关键词:测试Yahoo!和Google搜索引擎索引量的大小,这个测试做的非常详细,甚至包含了估算数字的准确性的校验。
Source favicon03:58 "Why I Read Business Blogs" » ProNet
Hillary Johnson's new piece in Inc, Why I Read Business Blogs is one of the best recent stories that explain the appeal of business blogs from a reader's perspective. The truth is that I recently quit my day job to...
Source favicon03:53 gVisit和MyGuestmap » WebLeOn's Blog
Google Maps开放的API让我们有机会看到各式各样有趣的第三方地图服务。gVisitMyGuestmap都是利用Google Maps开发的网站访客服务,也非常适合在Blog里使用。



gVisit可以在Google的地图上直观的显示网站访问者的地理位置。使用这项服务也很简单,只要输入网站名称以及网站的地址,就可以得到一段Javascript代码,把这段代码添加到网页中,就可以开始追踪你的访客信息了。你当然也可以把包含访客信息的地图显示在网站上,这是作者的例子



MyGuestmap则是一个利用Google Maps开发的免费留言板。在这里,你可以把自己的留言板放在Google Map上,比普通的Guestbook要好玩多了。当然,普通留言板的功能它也不缺,除了更改标题、邮件提醒、管理留言外,还可以自定义输出地图的大小,方便你把它嵌入自己的网站。可以到我刚刚建立的gUestMap留言板来看看效果。
Source favicon03:21 Adobe Blogs Launches » ProNet
We're very excited to see our friends at Adobe have just launched Adobe Blogs. It's a great leap forward for a company that makes the tools that many of us use every day, and Bill McCoy describes it well: ...I...
Source favicon03:03 A Little Information About Feeds » ProNet
We've published a page called About Feeds (XML, RSS and Atom) as a resource for people who aren't familiar with the technology to discover what feeds can do. Right now, the experience of reading and subscribing to feeds is very...
Source favicon02:57 Making books easier to find » Google Blog




In October 2004 we announced a program called Google Print, a way for publishers to make their books discoverable by the millions of people who search on Google every day. Shortly thereafter, we added a complementary program to help find all books more easily by partnering with libraries to index their collections too. The goal of Google Print is ambitious: to make the full text of all the world's books searchable by anyone. These books are hard to find now, and for most of them, no full-text search exists. We think that making books easier to find will have a positive impact on the world, and we welcome the challenge.



As with many ambitious ideas, Google Print has sparked a healthy amount of discussion. And we've been listening. Over the last few months, we’ve been talking with numerous publishers, publishing industry organizations and authors about our Google Print Publisher Program and Google Print Library Project. Today I’d like to mention two new features that reflect these discussions and which we feel will considerably improve both programs.



If you’re in the Publisher Program (or you decide to join it), you can now give us a list of the books that, if we scan them at a library, you’d like to have added immediately to your account. This way you can have your books in Google Print, which will put them into Google.com search results, direct potential buyers to your website, provide ongoing reports about user interest in your books, and your books will also earn revenue from contextual advertising – even if they are out of print.



We think most publishers and authors will choose to participate in the publisher program in order to introduce their work to countless readers around the world. But we know that not everyone agrees, and we want to do our best to respect their views too. So now, any and all copyright holders – both Google Print partners and non-partners – can tell us which books they’d prefer that we not scan if we find them in a library. To allow plenty of time to review these new options, we won’t scan any in-copyright books from now until this November.



We're going to continue talking about Google Print with our partners and the publishing industry. These discussions have been crucial in helping to build a program that benefits the industry and, most important, the millions of users who'll be able to discover new books. Stay tuned.



*Update: People have been asking us how we came to this new policy for the Google Print Library Project. We consulted with a variety of constituencies and ultimately decided that this new approach would best balance the rights and needs of users and publishers while remaining consistent with our web search policy. Google automatically indexes content across the web. Most web publishers find this service convenient and useful, but we gladly offer those who prefer that we not index their site a way of telling us not to do so via a robots.txt file. Similarly, the Library Project aims to make it convenient and useful for publishers to get their books into Google Print, but those publishers who don't want to take advantage of this service can now simply tell us which books they'd like us to exclude.
Source favicon02:55 Guest Bloggers: those Freakonomics Guys » Google Blog


We didn't know quite what to expect at Google during our visit last week. A few months ago we'd been asked to give some kind of presentation to an undetermined number of Google employees. Were we interested? Sure, we said. This was still many weeks ago. When something is that far away, you'll generally agree to it without much thought.

Because we arrived at Google late -- we were coming from a meeting with some people who may want to turn Freakonomics into a board game (!) — our tour was cut a little short. Still, we did manage to see:
Then it was time for our "presentation." We left Africa and our host, Google product manager Hunter Walk, walked us over to the room where we were speaking...

Whomp! It wasn’t some little room, with a conference table and a couple dozen people, as we'd imagined. It was a big, big room, rows and rows of chairs, all of them filled with Googlers, and many, many more Googlers sitting on the floor and standing in the back and – well, not exactly hanging from the rafters but it felt like it. The walls were black, the stage lights white-hot, the room alive with chatter. This wasn’t a presentation; this was a presentation. It was a Sally Field moment: They like us! They really like us! (We realize, of course, that the average Googler is far too young to catch this reference. Don't worry; it's not very funny anyway.) As we picked our way through the floor-sitting Googlers, it felt like we should have been carrying a couple of Telecasters; it was likely the closest that either of us will ever get to having a rock-star moment (in truth, Dubner was a minor-league rock star, but that was in the late 80s, so it doesn't really count).

Google had passed around a few hundred copies of Freakonomics (we immediately wondered if the order would be counted as a bulk sale, and therefore underweighted on the N.Y. Times best-seller list), so now, looking across the long rows of chairs, you could see one Googler after the next with the open book in his/her lap, as if preparing to hear a speech from Chairman Mao. It was, well, freaky. A bit like happening upon your own funeral.

There was one podium and one microphone, so we decided to do a tag-team talk, discussing the book (e.g., why crack dealers still live with their moms) and telling a few stories based on research that’s happened since the book (e.g., monkey prostitution at Yale). We seemed to do okay, based on the fact that everyone laughed a lot. The biggest laugh came when Levitt mentioned that we spoke at Yahoo! a day earlier and got a much smaller crowd. That was true; Google’s turnout was about double Yahoo!'s. On the other hand, that means Google may have lost twice the productivity (unless you think that our talk may have somehow increased productivity). The best question of the day was, "What would you do with our data if we could give it to you?" We've thought about that quite a bit ever since; we'll keep you posted.

After our talk, we spent a few minutes hanging around with miscellaneous Googlers. This was the most impressive slice of the day; not only were they all smart and inquisitive and friendly, but they were so damn happy. For instance, there's surely no company in the world where so many employees wear t-shirts with their company logo, which we took to be a sign of deep pride (or perhaps simply a deep discount).

One person we talked with after our presentation was actually an old friend of Dubner's, a writer named Anya Kamenetz who is the fiancee of a Google employee. Dubner hadn't seen her in a couple of years and had no idea she was even in California. Even stranger, Levitt had seen her on PBS not long ago, just as the two of us were starting to do TV appearances, and called up Dubner to say, I just saw this young woman named Anya on TV, and she was so good and natural at it that it made me realize that that’s how we should try to be on TV. The reason Levitt remembered her name is that Dubner's daughter is also named Anya, a name he (Dubner) chose in some part because Anya Kamenetz was such a good name model. So here, a few thousand miles and a few months away, all these strange random elements got tied up in a neat bow, on the Google campus. Somehow it doesn’t seem as if it could have happened anywhere else.

^==Back Home: www.chedong.com

<== 2005-08-17

==> 2005-08-19