Source favicon23:09 Cockblocker » English - The Real Deal
MPAA是Motion Picture Association of America(美国电影协会)的缩写。这个机构的其中一项任务就是给所有在美国上映的电影进行评级。评级的目的是让观众知道影片里包含多少少儿不宜的内容,从而方便他们在观看前做出相应的选择。 影片总共分五个级别:G、PG、PG-13、R和NC-17。 G表示所有年龄的观众都适宜观看,影片没有任何少儿不宜内容。PG表示建议家长指引,影片可能会有部分程度轻微的少儿不宜内容,但总体上是安全、干净的。PG-13表示强烈建议家长谨慎抉择,影片有明显的不宜13岁以下儿童观看的内容。R表示限制级,影片有较多的少儿不宜内容,未满17岁的人必须有家长或监护人的陪同才可以进场观看。NC-17则表示17岁以下的人一律不许收看,影片有大量的成人内容。 目前,大多数的电影都是PG-13或R级,它们或多或少含有粗口、性、暴力、毒品等成人内容,但这些内容只是为了推动剧情发展而存在,尚未达到三级片的程度。美国的电影院对R级电影的管制相当松懈,表面上是少儿不可单独观看,但实际上根本没人查看显示年龄的证件,未满17岁的少年大多进出自由。(这一点和对酒的管制有很大的区别。在美国买酒必须出示证件,未满21岁绝对不行。) G和PG级的电影比较少,一般都是动画片(如Finding Nemo、Mulan)或者有儿童主角的家庭片/励志片(如The Parent Trap、The Rookie)。我能想到的特例只有You’ve Got Mail和Sleepless in Seattle。巧的是,两本都是Tom Hanks和Meg Ryan主演的爱情片。 NC-17更是少见,一般只有在性尺度上接近黄片的电影才会得到这个评级。在我的印象中,近几年在电影院公映的作品没有一本是NC-17的。 前两天刚刚传出Paramount Pictures准备开拍一本由Topher Grace和Sean William Scott主演的喜剧的消息。两个人都算不上巨星,但这部戏却引起了高度关注,原因就在于这本电影的名字是Cockblocker。媒体纷纷用MPAA-challenged来形容它。 MPAA会不会批准这个名字还得拭目以待,不过这个新兴词汇还真挺流行。它的动词形式是cockblock,乃cock和block的合成词。顾名思义,它表示把cock挡住,也就是不让某人和别人做爱。这当中又分三种情形:一,女生充当自己女性朋友的军师,跟她一起去见男朋友,保证她不失身。二,男生阻止其他男性对某位女生的追求,原因可能是他想保护该女生,也可能是他自己想追这位女生。(影片里两位男主角的关系属于这一种。)三,不论男女,在不适当的时候出现,使原本想“做事”的一对无法做下去。各举一例如下: Jane asked Mary to come along as her cockblocker so Alex couldn’t possibly take advantage of her. Max is cockblocking every guy who wants to date Anita. He obviously has the hots for her himself. Stop cockblocking, will [...]
Source favicon22:11 Do Chinese journalists hate their jobs? » Danwei RSS 1.0
JDM051109press.jpg

Published on China Daily and making the rounds of people who like to discuss that sort of thing is a survey conducted in honor of Journalists' Day showing that 80% of people employed in the media profession in China want to change jobs.

No one is really shocked at this, and if they are, a quick glance at some of the other survey results - poor salary, health problems, saturated marketplace - explains things nicely. That the top two pressures faced by reporters were "deep discomfort over the inability to use public discourse to punish the bad and praise the good" and "inability to overcome obstacles on many fronts during the reporting process" merely confirms the conventional wisdom about China's media.

While these things may be true, it's probably best not to take the survey as ironclad evidence. Beijing's Mirror has as a subhead for its full-page spread on the results, "This paper joined with Zhaopin to conduct an online survey." And the official results themselves, which reveal nothing about methodology, note that "in the short space of one week, over 500 people participated in the survey." When asked about its surveys, Zhaopin revealed that each survey is conducted on its website on both the front page and in a related "survey column." Given the abundance of accurate online polls we've seen here at Danwei, we're inclined to view this one with the usual suspicion.

Furthermore, the reporting on this one has been pretty shoddy even for a web poll. China Daily mentions 500 responses, which is the number given in the results page at Zhaopin (Zhaopin conducts a poll every week but typically reports results in percentages, so this number is unusually precise). Jiefang Daily says "over 300 reporters," taken from the 2/3 of respondents who said they worked in media. The Mirror gives the number of valid forms as 650.

And the finding trumpeted in headlines as "80% of reporters want to change jobs" comes out of the question "Have you ever considered changing professions?" Not quite the same thing, and considering the source of the survey, quite understandable.

To commemorate Journalists' Day next year it'd be nice to have a survey of more than just reporters who happen to be cruising a headhunter site.

Links and Sources
Source favicon21:16 用户内容定制:MySyndicaat » WebLeOn's Blog
MySyndicaat提供非常好的内容定制服务,它可以对多个信息源进行组合及过滤,输出最符合自己兴趣而最少无关信息的内容。



MySyndicaat的内容定制器叫做FeedBot,听起来像搜索引擎的机器人。而事实上它工作起来也和搜索引擎有几分相似,可以根据用户的需求对内容进行搜索和过滤。一个FeedBot可以包含数量不限的信息源,包括RSS/Atom Feed、各类搜索引擎的搜索结果甚至任何普通的网页。你可以对每一个信息源分别进行关键词的过滤,聚合以后还可以对全局内容再次过滤。通过这样的过滤机制可以提炼出针对性非常强的个性内容。



每个MySyndicaat帐户都可以创建多个FeedBot,用来跟踪不同的主题。而MySyndicaat对每个FeedBot都提供HTML、RSS及OPML的输出格式,方便用户的不同应用。



MySyndicaat结合了FeedShakeFeedTier以及Rollyo的功能,在内容定制的功能上比较全面。不过它的易用性和社会性都有待增强。不能导入现有的OPML,也没有用户之间的分享机制,要自己创建一个个的FeedBot,真是一件比较痛苦的事情。
Source favicon20:46 澄清关于按摩乳的事情 » 安替博客
带三个表编造了一段我脱衣服来解释按摩乳的故事。(http://lydon.yculblog.com/post.950603.html
 
丫造谣。我没脱衣服。的确把中文的东西翻译成英文、并且让老外能懂是很难的事情。今年博客大赛,我在这个方面下了不少功夫,也起了成效。我举两个例子。
 
一个就是带三个表的“按摩乳”。我是直接翻译成Massage Cream(按摩乳油),但关键在解释。我对这些老外说:“在中国,买性是非法的,于是按摩就成了一种和性相关的娱乐,而这个Massage Cream就是在中国用来满足男人小弟弟的东西。该博客用这种介于非法和合法之间的性娱乐来隐喻他的嘲讽加自我嘲讽的反抗方式”。立刻好几个国际男评委说,哦,哈哈,我喜欢。我再介绍一下,12个评委中,只有一个是女的。
 
另外一个例子是“钱烈宪要发炎”,他本意是说“前列腺要发炎”和“一个干部要发言”双关。英文要表达这种双关是很难。还好给我想出来了。我把他翻译成Pro-State-In-Flames:如果你看成2个词,(the) prostate inflames,就是说前列腺正在发炎,但是如果你看成四个词,意思就是 (such) pro-state stuff (is) in flames,就是这些亲政府的东西成为争论焦点。
 
我基本算是好sales,这些语言游戏我也介绍足了。因此好些评委后来一直记着这个满足男人小弟弟的东西,竟然超过了对我着力推荐的“多背一公斤”的兴趣。每个奖项我只有一票,我对公益事业的努力推荐也抵挡不过某些潜意识东西的影响,他们虽然口口声声说什么“多背一公斤”是集体博客,不能体现博客个性化精神,但我还是认为实在因为是我介绍按摩乳的时候太地道了。最后只能投票表决,我少数票,老外支持带三表哥。
 
等结果完全公布了,我再给大家仔细介绍各国优秀博客的精彩之处。
 
另外,带三个表自己的翻译,Massage Milk,也实在太黄了一点,建议还是用国际通行的Massage Cream。
Source favicon20:38 Links:网志年会心得与印象 » CNBlog: Blog on Blog

年会谢幕,Blogging却不会停止。
下面是部分参会Blogger的心得与印象:

Source favicon17:39 年会的零散补记 » 未完成 - Incomplete
在这几天陆续看到一些对年会的回顾文章,所以思绪还会经常被带回精彩纷呈的那两天,所以忍不住还想再写下一些零散的回忆和感受。 年会上来了不少教育相关的Blogger和潜在Blogger,不知道是否很多都是冲着庄秀丽老师而来的,当然在Blog的行业应用中,教育的确是Blog应用最为广泛也最为深入的一个行业,也有很多老师正在非常关注Blog并希望开展应用,在唐韵茶楼时曾经与一位来自东莞的老师进行过一番交流,她就是希望来进一步了解Blog在教育领域的应用,而且还表示只要服务好的话,可以考虑使用收费的Blog服务,所以我也推荐了Andy的Livebiz给她,不知道能不能撮合这个生意。 在会议的间隙与豆瓣的阿北作了一次比较详细的交流,提出一个针对每个用户想读想看的书、电影和音乐的评论生成RSS输出的想法,希望阿北能够有时间尽快推出,这样的话我就更容易跟踪自己想阅读的书和想看的电影了。虽然我也同意豆瓣还有许多需要改进的地方,但毫无疑问豆瓣已经成为中国Web2.0的一个重要标杆,我也不避讳承认自己是豆瓣的粉丝,而且也准备很快在China Web2.0 Review上写Post来介绍豆瓣。吕欣欣还在考虑和怂恿有人掺乎进去和豆瓣竞争,另一方面阿北也开始北上寻求更好的人才来加强豆瓣的实力,我相信一定会出现豆瓣的竞争者,但一段时间之内仍然会是不可取代的。 在年会上特别高兴认识了Royal,一个崇拜很久了的网络元老级人物,在色影无忌与江湖上都看过Royal的很多精彩照片。以前曾经订阅了Royal在Blogbus上的窝,不过后来那里不再更新了,只能在豆瓣上看看他写的书评和影评,还是这次年会才找到了他的新窝。同样没想到的是Royal与yining是Partner,以后回福州可以找他们聊聊天了。 盛会已经结束,第二届年会希望能够有几个方面的改进:参与的blogger以及探讨的话题可以再适当地多样化一些,可以考虑分组进行讨论,而且在文字直播以及与未能到会的在线Blogger进行互动方面也都需要作进一步的改进。
Source favicon16:37 无处不在的分类技术:Google Groups增加相关论坛功能 » 车东[Blog^2]

感觉Google Groups一直是上下文匹配技术的试验田:除了文章列表右侧有动态的AdSense广告和相关网页内容提示外,我今天在论坛的后台管理界面中也看到了相关论坛。(不知道这2天后台管理一直不能用是不是这个原因。)
related-group.png

在没有相关论坛功能之前:大部分论坛全部都是“孤岛”,而基于主题自动提取的分类/类聚机制无疑会加大论坛之间的交互,

Source favicon15:47 一搜深情谢幕 雅虎搜索全新登场 » Che Dong's Photos

Che Dong posted a photo:

一搜深情谢幕 雅虎搜索全新登场

www.yisou.com ==> www.yahoo.com.cn

我感谢大家对一搜的支持……

Registrant:
Alibaba.com Corporation
Room 2403-05 Jubilee Centre
Wanchai
Hong Kong
HK

Domain Name: YISOU.COM

Administrative Contact, Technical Contact:
Alibaba.com Corporation joe@ALIBABA-INC.COM
Room 2403-05 Jubilee Centre
Wanchai
Hong Kong
HK
852 2215-5100 fax: 852 2215-5200

Record expires on 25-Mar-2007.
Record created on 27-Oct-2005.
Database last updated on 9-Nov-2005 09:48:03 EST.

Domain servers in listed order:

NS1.FEIYANG.NET 61.135.128.170
NS2.FEIYANG.NET 218.1.65.138
NS3.FEIYANG.NET 60.191.5.158

Source favicon15:23 DW安替访谈:博客的写作自由 » 安替博客
怪圈现象:在中国被封杀,国际上就出名。比如中国的一些地下电影。博客界也不例外。德国之声博客大赛的提名博客“王怡的麦克风”在大赛期间被封。国际媒体纷纷关注。中国评委安替如是说:
 
德国之声:第一次作为国际评委来到波恩参加博客评选工作,在这段时间和国际博客界的接触后,你看到中国博客和国际博客间的差异或者共同点了吗?
 
安替:经过这次评选我感到中国的博客和国际上的一些优秀博客有差别。比如在质量和创意方面,比如法国的博客普遍给人的感觉是比中国的创意得好,虽然在国外,博客是对专业媒体的一种反抗,但是即便作为非专业的博客人,他们的博客的专业水平非常高。而相比来说中国的博客是个人化并且是非专业的表达。
 
德国之声:但是在言论没有自由的国家,比如伊朗和阿拉伯的一些国家,那里的博客情况如何?
 
安替:我感觉中国和伊朗以及一些阿拉伯国家的博客是属于一个阵营的,他们在写作和政治的表达上面应该是很相似的。所以当我们在看伊朗博客的时候,很多时候给你似曾相识的感觉。另外在国际上有一种团体博客的出现。在国外,团体博客和媒体博客越来越多,但是在中国现在大家一起联合做博客的事情还比较少,而媒体自己制作博客的很少,影响也不大。
 
德国之声:自从德国之声举办博客大赛后,最近在国内博客门户和大型网站争相举办针对中文博客的大赛,这对博客发展有什么利弊影响?
 
安替: 我对国内博客的发展持有自己的观点。我个人认为新浪、搜狐举办博客大赛是对博客发展有好处的,至于有人批评这些大赛都带有自己的商业目的,有炒作的因素,但我认为媒体炒作博客依然有利博客的发展。博客以后怎样发展并非由媒体左右。它最后还是看中国全体博客人大家写作的结果。
 
德国之声:你在这次大赛的评选中,是否对中国博客心存“私心”,希望更多中国博客在国际舞台上得奖?
 
安替:我希望中国博客得奖是因为真正的质量,而非通过“评委政治”,评委之间的妥协最后出现一个意料不到的获奖者。这样不能真正反映中国博客的发展。客观评价中国博客才是我想要的。
 
德国之声:中国博客的发展和一个背景有关,那就是中国现在还没有言论自由,正如本次大赛被提名为“最佳博客”和“记者无疆界”特别奖的王怡的麦克风就在提名阶段在中国被屏蔽了。目前评委提出集体抗议并要求中国政府马上解禁王怡的博客,你觉得中国政府会作出什么样的反应?
 
安替:我们呼吁中国政府立即重新开启王怡的博客空间,至于中国政府怎么反应就不是我能过问的了。我认为博客的写作自由是言论自由的组成部分,去保护博客的写作自由,对被封的博客表示援助和抗议是我们推动整个博客发展的组成部分。
 
德国之声:恰恰是王怡的博客被封发生在博客大赛举行的同期,国际媒体对此纷纷表示关注,据了解,在英文媒体中关于这个事件的报道非常多,这其实对中国政府产生负面的影响,本来王怡的博客在国外不是有很多人知道,而通过这个事件,王怡在国外更有名了。中国政府采取这样的措施是否适得其反?
 
安替:我不太关心中国政府处理问题是得到好处还是负面的影响。作为博客大赛的评委,我的作用是推动中国博客的发展,至于有些博客受到政府的封锁,那我们就会作出相应的抗议。作为评委和博客人,我对中国政府既没有建议,也没有责任去为中国政府考虑他们采取措施的利弊。
Source favicon11:40 The Taiwan Trip So Far » Jeremy Zawodny's blog
Travel Pillow Originally uploaded by jzawodn. This trip has been unusual in many respects so far. Here I enumerate and comment on them for my own amusement and because I'm running on limited mental power—you know, that feeling when you've slept several hours in 20 minute bursts on a loud plane? Anyway... It's about 11:30am here, which is 7:30pm "yesterday" at home. That's weird enough. It all started when I arrived at SFO and went to the EVA Air...
Source favicon10:52 Massage Milk and the disaster of journalism in China » Danwei RSS 1.0
life_weekly_blog.jpg
Life Weekly's cover: All the people blog

Massage Milk is China's best blog, in your correspondent's opinion. The blogger, who goes by the name Dai San Ge Biao, writes caustic commentary on Chinese media, and is a master of humorous sarcasm with a Beijing flavor.

Dai San Ge Biao's real name is Wang Xiaofeng. He is a journalist at Life Weekly magazine, of which the latest issue's cover is reproduced here.

This is a rough translation of a recent post:

Looks like blogging's good times are over

The cover story of this week's issue of Life Week is about blogs, the cover of the current issue of China Newsweek is also about blogs, next week's issue of Newsweek (U.S.A.) will contain an article about blogs in China. With such a fuss being made, we are surely about to see some 'improvement and rectification' [i.e. a clamp down].

Another recent Massage Milk piece was published on the same day that Xinhua published 'Most reporters in China want to change jobs'. The Massage Milk post was titled called Journalist's Disaster (记者劫), a pun on the words for Journalist's Day (like Mothers Day etc.) Here is a rough translation of the post:

Yesterday morning someobody sent me an SMS wishing me happy holiday. I though about it for the longest time but I couldn't remember what holiday it was. Then someobody told me it was Journalist's Day. Then I asked myself: "Am I a journalist?"

I have always been ashamed of the word 'journalist'. When I had just graduated, I wanted to be a journalist covering social issues, but later I discovered that my personality was not suitable for this such work.

Once I was talking to a boss of mine. He had a lot of money and nowehere to invest it. I asked him, why don't you invest it in media. He said he once went to XXXX Evening News and he saw that there was a huge pile of documents on the editor-in-chief's desk. All of those documents were notices ordering that the newspaper was not allowed to report on this and on that. Then he said to himself, investing in media is risky. A businessman's way of thinking is to minimize risk to the lowest possible level and to avoid investments where the risk cannot be controlled.

The Beijing News has a slogan that they use in their advertising: "Responsibly reporting about everything". I have come up with another slogan for them to use: "Responsibly reporting about certain things".

At the end of the day, is it "responsibly reporting about everything" or "responsibly reporting about certain things" that will make society more harmonious? It is self-evident to people who understand.

Before becoming a journalist, I had many dreams such as becoming a journalist with a conscience. Damn. After becoming a journalist, I found out that you either lose your conscience, or you lose your self-confidence. Journalists, these people, they still deserve their own fucking holiday!?

After reading He Qinglian's Chinese journalists: dancing in shackles, I suddenly felt that being a journalist is really fucking pointless and boring. Is it 'Journalist's Day' (记者节) or 'Journalist's Disaster' (记者劫)? If one day I stop being a journalist, I will totally part ways with the media industry.



Another good post by Dai San ge Biao was previously published on Danwei:

Our editor has at last erected a blog!


God, god, god!

I used to believe that there were a few things I'd never see during my lifetime, like the sun exploding, the Pacific Ocean drying up, China following a multi-party system, and our editor-in-chief running a blog. But our editor-in-chief has suddenly appeared on the contemptible Sina Blog service. So now I've begun to believe that in my lifetime I may see the sun explode, the Pacific Ocean turn into cropland, and China implement separation of powers ... imagine, what a beautiful future - you can walk through fields of sorghum to get to America.

Links and Sources
Source favicon09:08 致网易科技公开信 » blog中文翻译
致网易科技编辑:多谢关注blog中文翻译,但是本站文章的版权声明请参看页面右侧,非常显目明确。你们已经至少转载了本站两篇文章: IBM 给公司播客定规 http://tech.163.com/05/1103/08/21KE5UB6000915HL.html 资本推动WEB2.0发展 盈利模式是关注的焦点 http://tech.163.com/05/1107/09/21UQQJ3O00091M9B.html 在此之前,你们还有其它侵犯blogger的版权权益事件,你等五次三番的侵权作为实在是十分无耻,希望能尽快删除转载的文章,并且能够在网易科技首页给出道歉。处理结果可在本文下留言,或者Email至blogbeta AT gmail.com Update:网易科技已经删除上述两文。多谢快速处理。上述言词有不当之处,多谢包涵。
Source favicon06:52 Why does a business need more than one blog? » ProNet
Many of you spend a lot of time and effort just trying to convince your company or your clients to start a blog. But we think that, in many cases, the need is even greater: Many companies need to start...
Source favicon06:02 Vint Cerf speaks out on net neutrality » Official Google Blog




Congress is holding a hearing tomorrow, Wednesday, November 8th, on "network neutrality" and a big new telecommunications bill affecting the Internet. Vint Cerf, our net neutrality guru, was unable to testify because of a little awards ceremony at the White House (congratulations, Vint!), but here is his letter to the Hill outlining our concerns. Microsoft will be testifying for our side, demonstrating that inside the Beltway, we agree on a lot.



You can follow the proceedings here -- and we hope you do. This bill could fundamentally alter the fabulously successful end-to-end Internet.





November 8, 2005



The Honorable Joe Barton

Chairman

Committee on Energy and Commerce

U.S. House of Representatives

Washington, D.C. 20515



The Honorable John D. Dingell

Ranking Member

Committee on Energy and Commerce

U.S. House of Representatives

Washington, D.C. 20515



Dear Chairman Barton and Ranking Member Dingell,



I appreciate the inquiries by your staff about my availability to appear before the Committee and to share Google’s views about draft telecommunications legislation and the issues related to "network neutrality." These are matters of great importance to the Internet and Google welcomes the Committee’s hard work and attention. The hearing unfortunately conflicts with another obligation, and I am sorry I will not be able to attend. (Along with my colleague Robert Kahn, I am honored to be receiving the Presidential Medal of Freedom on Wednesday at the White House for our work in creating the Internet protocol TCP/IP.)



Despite my inability to participate in the planned hearing in person, I hope that you will accept some brief observations about this legislation.



The remarkable social impact and economic success of the Internet is in many ways directly attributable to the architectural characteristics that were part of its design. The Internet was designed with no gatekeepers over new content or services. The Internet is based on a layered, end-to-end model that allows people at each level of the network to innovate free of any central control. By placing intelligence at the edges rather than control in the middle of the network, the Internet has created a platform for innovation. This has led to an explosion of offerings – from VOIP to 802.11x wi-fi to blogging – that might never have evolved had central control of the network been required by design.



My fear is that, as written, this bill would do great damage to the Internet as we know it. Enshrining a rule that broadly permits network operators to discriminate in favor of certain kinds of services and to potentially interfere with others would place broadband operators in control of online activity. Allowing broadband providers to segment their IP offerings and reserve huge amounts of bandwidth for their own services will not give consumers the broadband Internet our country and economy need. Many people will have little or no choice among broadband operators for the foreseeable future, implying that such operators will have the power to exercise a great deal of control over any applications placed on the network.



As we move to a broadband environment and eliminate century-old non-discrimination requirements, a lightweight but enforceable neutrality rule is needed to ensure that the Internet continues to thrive. Telephone companies cannot tell consumers who they can call; network operators should not dictate what people can do online.



I am confident that we can build a broadband system that allows users to decide what websites they want to see and what applications they want to use – and that also guarantees high quality service and network security. That network model has and can continue to provide economic benefits to innovators and consumers -- and to the broadband operators who will reap the rewards for providing access to such a valued network.



We appreciate the efforts in your current draft to create at least a starting point for net neutrality principles. Google looks forward to working with you and your staff to draft a bill that will maintain the revolutionary potential of the broadband Internet.



Thank you for your attention and for your efforts on these important issues.



Sincerely,



Vinton Cerf

Chief Internet Evangelist

Google Inc.
Source favicon01:02 Don’t Panic! WordPress Is Secure » My Weblog
There is news of a worm which uses a vulnerability in the PHPXMLRPC libraries to spread a computer virus. Some articles are pointing to out-of-date information claiming that WordPress 1.5 is vulnerable. That is incorrect. WordPress 1.5 or higher is safe. Since the release of version 1.5, WordPress has used a completely different XML-RPC library, [...]
Source favicon00:07 Search and replace » Official Google Blog




We’re hearing a fair number of stories from customers using our enterprise search products about how pleased their users are when they replace another search engine with a Google Search Appliance or a Google Mini. Customers like National Semiconductor, which saw search volume increase by 8-10x, and the National Park Service, where website complaints declined by a factor of 20.



These good results have inspired us to launch a search replacement program: any company that replaces their legacy search engine with a Google Search Appliance will receive a free Google Mini. Read more at www.google.com/switch.

^==Back Home: www.chedong.com

<== 2005-11-08

==> 2005-11-10