Che Dong posted a photo:
图灵试验是提出的一个关于机器人的著名判断原则。 此原则说：如果一个人使用任意一串问题去询问两个他不能看见的对象：一个是正常思维的人；一个是机器，如果经过若干询问以后他不能得出实质的区别，则他就可以认为该机器业已具备了人的“智慧”(AI)。
摘自：
www.ectend.com/blog/article.asp?id=89
感谢上周四车东的精彩讲座和会后的讨论。本周四2月23日新的沙龙主题如下：
题目：中文分词和关键词的提取
主讲人：罗刚（猎兔分词的发明人）
地点：博客吧（必思浓咖啡店）
时间：晚上７点开始
This past December we quietly made a change to the way people search on Microsoft.com – Microsoft.com Search is now powered by MSN Search. This was an exciting project to work on. We were super jazzed that another team wanted to use our search technology and the Microsoft.com team was equally excited to be upgrading their search to the best Internet Search technology that Microsoft has to offer. Not only that, but this was not just any team, but rather search for Microsoft.com which is one of top 10 sites on the Internet. The exact position within the top 10 depends on whose numbers you trust most :)
The result we think is a far improved search of Microsoft.com content – the satisfaction levels of Microsoft.com search are up and the number of people using search.microsoft.com also increased. The true judge, however, of whether we are delivering good results is you. So, stop by search.microsoft.com, try out your favorite queries and send us some feedback.
an interactive photo mosaic of a graphical icon or logo made up of hundreds of relevant website screenshots, demonstrating the concept "a picture is worth a thousand websites". for instance: the live top 957 front page stories from online story aggregator digg.com, a Flickr logo of photos tagged 'wow+blue', 'wow+pink', & 'wow+white', & so on. see also visual cover explorer. the commercial aspect reminds of the million dollar homepage. [urlyart.com]
鉴于CNBlog没有版主、编辑，只有作者和读者，无法删除Topku 的原贴（因为cnblog更换过系统更早的原贴在这里）。所以只能替读者转发此信，不做评论。呵呵，请我喝茶哦。
===========================================================================
Cnblog.您好！
我是北京易赛诺公司的负责人，偶尔看到了这条信息，恳切希望您能将下面的文章删除，我已经查过此事了，确实是有人当时发送留言给你们（当时有人在我们做的一个项目，我们公司不知道怎么做的)，但是绝对不是公司执行行为，我代表公司向您表示诚挚的歉意。
并且我们公司现在有70人左右的团队，有5000固定客户，现在一些不怀好意的竞争对手正在恶意的攻击我们公司，并且进行群发和传播，如果是这样，对我们公司影响特别的坏！
非常抱歉！
请您尽快删除。
来北京请您喝茶！
地址：blog.cnblog.org/archives/2004/01/oaoeeaeaoeoe_ww.html
我们已经通过了google的认证，是以经营Google Adwords 广告和网站建设为主，这是我们公司的google认证页面：
https://adwords.google.com/select/ProfessionalStatus?id=0tRB1s_zx6HTdbekH5jZAQ&hl=en_US
Imagine the following scenario: The American congress passes a bill that makes it practically impossible for American Internet companies to operate and compete in the Chinese market, in attempt to prevent censorship and spread freedom. The new law puts a serious dent in American companies’ ability to operate and compete in the Chinese market. In addition, the few publicly listed Chinese media companies that are not government-owned are also damaged, since most of them went public in the US and must comply with American laws. In the meantime, the Chinese people affirm their belief that America is out to harm them and hinder the development of their economy.
Now try this one: Multinational companies continue to develop services in China. The Chinese public is exposed to more and more information from other countries. China’s communication market becomes more open (slowly…) as more foreign and local money is invested inline with financial - and not political - imperatives. The people of China learn to appreciate the benefits of being a free market economy and just can't have enough...
The Internet develops faster than the laws that govern it. It is important for law makers to respond promptly to the challenges this development brings. But promptly should not mean hysterically, or sanctimoniously. Business is still business, and the market still knows best. New law(s) should draw clear lines on Internet companies’ responsibilities for activities the world over, starting with America. There are plenty of questions that need answering. Below are a few suggestions:
1. Are Internet companies obliged to provide Congress with information on users and usage, even for educational and research purposes?
2. Under what circumstances can American lawmakers request an Internet company to block access to copyrighted material (as it now does)?
3. What is the procedure for companies from other industries, less powerful than the Music Industry, to gain such protection?
4. What are the penalties for American Internet companies that currently block content by request from some European governments? What is the procedure by which these web sites are evaluated and selected?
In any case, China should not be singled out. Fellow Americans, have faith in the market’s wisdom. As the great sage Lao Zi wrote 2,500 years ago:
The Market abides in non-action, yet nothing is left undone. If kings and lords observed this, the ten thousand things would develop naturally. If they still desired to act, they would return to the simplicity of formless substance. Without form there is no desire. Without desire there is tranquility. And in this way all things would be at peace.
an interactive resting place for a fashion studio in Berlin, displaying the continuous streams of information, news & data. the chair is designed to catch digital fragments derived from ongoing world affairs & events & relay them back into the physical space of the designer’s studio to let them condensate on the creative environment. the projection is using electromechanical character sets that project words & short sentences onto a special mirror. the rhythm of the incoming data packets can be influenced by visitors resting on the chair to influence the frequency of incoming news.
[maoworks.com]
"At this time, the hogs of the region ran wild, as they do now in portions of the border states. Some of them were savage, and all, after the manner of swine, were difficult to manage...All the ordinary resources were exhausted in the attempts to get them on board. There was but one alternative, and this Abraham adopted. He actually carried them on board, one by one. His long arms and great strength enabled him to grasp them as in a vise, and to transfer them rapidly one by one from the shore to boat."It's the early 1800s, and the "Abraham" in question is Abraham Lincoln, whose his superior hog-handling skills are described at length in J.B. McClure's Anecdotes of Abraham Lincoln and Lincoln's Stories, one of the many public domain books you can browse using Google Book Search.
上周末和老肖聚会，见到了BugFree的作者刘振飞。BugFree是国内很成功的一套开源Bug跟踪系统；基于PHP/MySQL架构。下午聊的内容很多也是关于网站和软件开发过程一些流程系统。振飞在微软工作过一段时间：而微软内部的Bug Tracking系统Product Studio是他认为最强大的工具之一。BugFree的很多设计如果是借鉴了Product Studio，那么开发者也能从中感受一下微软成功的开发过程。
我个人对开源软件的开发了解多一点。至少在Apache基金会上可以看到他们使用的是以下几个系统的组合：
版本控制：
最早使用的是CVS，目前已经迁移到了SVN上。
Bug/Issue Tracking:
（可选）JIRA(Java)或者BugZilla
文档共享：
Apache目前选择的WIKI平台是：MoinMoin(Python)
邮件列表/归档：
记得以前用的是EyeBrowse(Java)
