On Apache
Under GNU General Public License
2024-12-22 12:17 @3.15.18.73 CrawledBy Mozilla/5.0 AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko; compatible; ClaudeBot/1.0; +claudebot@anthropic.com)
File: coreutils.info, Node: shred invocation, Prev: rm invocation, Up: Basic operations
11.6 'shred': Remove files more securely
========================================
'shred' overwrites devices or files, to help prevent even extensive
forensics from recovering the data.
Ordinarily when you remove a file (*note rm invocation::), its data
and metadata are not actually destroyed. Only the file's directory
entry is removed, and the file's storage is reclaimed only when no
process has the file open and no other directory entry links to the
file. And even if file's data and metadata's storage space is freed for
further reuse, there are undelete utilities that will attempt to
reconstruct the file from the data in freed storage, and that can bring
the file back if the storage was not rewritten.
On a busy system with a nearly-full device, space can get reused in a
few seconds. But there is no way to know for sure. And although the
undelete utilities and already-existing processes require insider or
superuser access, you may be wary of the superuser, of processes running
on your behalf, or of attackers that can physically access the storage
device. So if you have sensitive data, you may want to be sure that
recovery is not possible by plausible attacks like these.
The best way to remove something irretrievably is to destroy the
media it's on with acid, melt it down, or the like. For cheap removable
media this is often the preferred method. However, some storage devices
are expensive or are harder to destroy, so the 'shred' utility tries to
achieve a similar effect non-destructively, by overwriting the file with
non-sensitive data.
*Please note* that 'shred' relies on a crucial assumption: that the
file system and hardware overwrite data in place. Although this is
common and is the traditional way to do things, but many modern file
system designs do not satisfy this assumption. Exceptions include:
* Log-structured or journaled file systems, such as ext3/ext4 (in
'data=journal' mode), Btrfs, NTFS, ReiserFS, XFS, ZFS, file systems
supplied with AIX and Solaris, etc., when they are configured to
journal data.
* File systems that write redundant data and carry on even if some
writes fail, such as RAID-based file systems.
* File systems that make snapshots, such as Network Appliance's NFS
server.
* File systems that cache in temporary locations, such as NFS version
3 clients.
* Compressed file systems.
For ext3 and ext4 file systems, 'shred' is less effective when the
file system is in 'data=journal' mode, which journals file data in
addition to just metadata. In both the 'data=ordered' (default) and
'data=writeback' modes, 'shred' works as usual. The ext3/ext4
journaling modes can be changed by adding the 'data=something' option to
the mount options for a particular file system in the '/etc/fstab' file,
as documented in the 'mount' man page ('man mount'). Alternatively, if
you know how large the journal is, you can shred the journal by
shredding enough file data so that the journal cycles around and fills
up with shredded data.
If you are not sure how your file system operates, then you should
assume that it does not overwrite data in place, which means 'shred'
cannot reliably operate on regular files in your file system.
Generally speaking, it is more reliable to shred a device than a
file, since this bypasses file system design issues mentioned above.
However, devices are also problematic for shredding, for reasons such as
the following:
* Solid-state storage devices (SSDs) typically do wear leveling to
prolong service life, and this means writes are distributed to
other blocks by the hardware, so "overwritten" data blocks are
still present in the underlying device.
* Most storage devices map out bad blocks invisibly to the
application; if the bad blocks contain sensitive data, 'shred'
won't be able to destroy it.
* With some obsolete storage technologies, it may be possible to take
(say) a floppy disk back to a laboratory and use a lot of sensitive
(and expensive) equipment to look for the faint "echoes" of the
original data underneath the overwritten data. With these older
technologies, if the file has been overwritten only once, it's
reputedly not even that hard. Luckily, this kind of data recovery
has become difficult, and there is no public evidence that today's
higher-density storage devices can be analyzed in this way.
The 'shred' command can use many overwrite passes, with data
patterns chosen to maximize the damage they do to the old data. By
default the patterns are designed for best effect on hard drives
using now-obsolete technology; for newer devices, a single pass
should suffice. For more details, see the source code and Peter
Gutmann's paper 'Secure Deletion of Data from Magnetic and
Solid-State Memory'
(https://www.cs.auckland.ac.nz/~pgut001/pubs/secure_del.html), from
the proceedings of the Sixth USENIX Security Symposium (San Jose,
California, July 22-25, 1996).
'shred' makes no attempt to detect or report these problems, just as
it makes no attempt to do anything about backups. However, since it is
more reliable to shred devices than files, 'shred' by default does not
deallocate or remove the output file. This default is more suitable for
devices, which typically cannot be deallocated and should not be
removed.
Finally, consider the risk of backups and mirrors. File system
backups and remote mirrors may contain copies of the file that cannot be
removed, and that will allow a shredded file to be recovered later. So
if you keep any data you may later want to destroy using 'shred', be
sure that it is not backed up or mirrored.
shred [OPTION]... FILE[...]
The program accepts the following options. Also see *note Common
options::.
'-f'
'--force'
Override file permissions if necessary to allow overwriting.
'-n NUMBER'
'--iterations=NUMBER'
By default, 'shred' uses 3 passes of overwrite. You can reduce
this to save time, or increase it if you think it's appropriate.
After 25 passes all of the internal overwrite patterns will have
been used at least once.
'--random-source=FILE'
Use FILE as a source of random data used to overwrite and to choose
pass ordering. *Note Random sources::.
'-s BYTES'
'--size=BYTES'
Shred the first BYTES bytes of the file. The default is to shred
the whole file. BYTES can be followed by a size specification like
'K', 'M', or 'G' to specify a multiple. *Note Block size::.
'-u'
'--remove[=HOW]'
After shredding a file, deallocate it (if possible) and then remove
it. If a file has multiple links, only the named links will be
removed. Often the file name is less sensitive than the file data,
in which case the optional HOW parameter, supported with the long
form option, gives control of how to more efficiently remove each
directory entry. The 'unlink' parameter will just use a standard
unlink call, 'wipe' will also first obfuscate bytes in the name,
and 'wipesync' will also sync each obfuscated byte in the name to
disk. Note 'wipesync' is the default method, but can be expensive,
requiring a sync for every character in every file. This can
become significant with many files, or is redundant if your file
system provides synchronous metadata updates.
'-v'
'--verbose'
Display to standard error all status updates as sterilization
proceeds.
'-x'
'--exact'
By default, 'shred' rounds the size of a regular file up to the
next multiple of the file system block size to fully erase the
slack space in the last block of the file. This space may contain
portions of the current system memory on some systems for example.
Use '--exact' to suppress that behavior. Thus, by default if you
shred a 10-byte regular file on a system with 512-byte blocks, the
resulting file will be 512 bytes long. With this option, shred
does not increase the apparent size of the file.
'-z'
'--zero'
Normally, the last pass that 'shred' writes is made up of random
data. If this would be conspicuous on your storage device (for
example, because it looks like encrypted data), or you just think
it's tidier, the '--zero' option adds an additional overwrite pass
with all zero bits. This is in addition to the number of passes
specified by the '--iterations' option.
You might use the following command to erase the file system you
created on a USB flash drive. This command typically takes several
minutes, depending on the drive's size and write speed. On modern
storage devices a single pass should be adequate, and will take one
third the time of the default three-pass approach.
shred -v -n 1 /dev/sdd1
Similarly, to erase all data on a selected partition of your hard
disk, you could give a command like the following.
# 1 pass, write pseudo-random data; 3x faster than the default
shred -v -n1 /dev/sda5
To be on the safe side, use at least one pass that overwrites using
pseudo-random data. I.e., don't be tempted to use '-n0 --zero', in case
some disk controller optimizes the process of writing blocks of all
zeros, and thereby does not clear all bytes in a block. Some SSDs may
do just that.
A FILE of '-' denotes standard output. The intended use of this is
to shred a removed temporary file. For example:
i=$(mktemp)
exec 3<>"$i"
rm -- "$i"
echo "Hello, world" >&3
shred - >&3
exec 3>-
However, the command 'shred - >file' does not shred the contents of
FILE, since the shell truncates FILE before invoking 'shred'. Use the
command 'shred file' or (if using a Bourne-compatible shell) the command
'shred - 1<>file' instead.
An exit status of zero indicates success, and a nonzero value
indicates failure.
Generated by $Id: phpMan.php,v 4.55 2007/09/05 04:42:51 chedong Exp $ Author: Che Dong
On Apache
Under GNU General Public License
2024-12-22 12:17 @3.15.18.73 CrawledBy Mozilla/5.0 AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko; compatible; ClaudeBot/1.0; +claudebot@anthropic.com)