There are lists you just don't want to find yourself on. Like "Worst Dressed (If You Were Trying)," or "Likelier than Not to Stamp Those License Plates." (We've stayed clear of both thus far, though the former is well within reach). However, there are lists that come along that demand much more favorable attention. One such destination is the Red Herring 100.
Here is a group of private technology firms in North America that have been recognized by Red Herring for their part in "Driving the Future of Technology." Editors identify new and innovative technology firms and entrepreneurs that are changing the way we live and work (they spotted Google and eBay in their early days).
This year, FeedBurner makes the list and we'd be totally fibbing if we said we weren't stoked about it. In fact, there was much rejoicing. You can read more about this award in the be-all/end-all source of news: The Press Release. Also, be sure to visit Red Herring for the latest on innovation, technology, financing and entrepreneurial activity.
We'll pause now to enjoy this recognition. — Smartly Accessorized Pause Here — Now, back to innovating!
Here is the letter:
Dear Mr Wang,
Hi, I am name removed from Singapore. I am deeply impressed how resourceful and helpful your blog/website are.
Kindly allow me to consult you regarding one matter. I will be visiting Changshu next month & will carry with me a big luggage bag. I understand there are 3 ways to travel from PVG to Changshu:
(1) From PVG, take direct bus to Suzhou. From Suzhou, take a taxi to hotel in Changshu. Total travel time: ab. 160 min. Total cost: ab. RMB 175.
(2) From PVG, take taxi to Shanghai shuttle bus station, then take a bus to Changshu shuttle bus station, then take taxi to hotel. Total travel time: ab. 190 min. Total cost: ab. RMB142.
(3) From PVG, take bus to SHG (Hong Qiao Int'l Airport). At SHG, take bus to Changshu, then take taxi to hotel. Total travel time: ab. 190 min? Cost: ab. RMB 97?
Pls advise which is the best route (1), (2) or (3) for me to take considering the fact that I am carrying a big luggage with me.
Ease and convenience are more important than costs factors.
Kindly advise the details (where to buy bus ticket, where to take the bus/taxi etc) of the recommended route.
Thanking you in anticipation.
I will answer the question after dinner. :-D
2 hours passed
I am back from dinner and have the energy to help on this question.
Disclaimer: I didn't personally try this route, the information I provided is based on the information I got from Internet or from my observation. It may contain mistakes.
I would recommend option 1), if cost is not a priority. Reasons:
To reduce the burden of carrying big luggage with you, I suggest you to get to a Suzhou as soon as possible, instead of hanging around in the city of Shanghai. The long-distance bus is just outside the international arrival hall. You can use the small cart to move your luggage to the station (I am not sure if you need to lift it for some stairs, or you can get there from the level 2 of the airport.
At Suzhou, many taxis should line up and I believe the person who pick you is lucky, since the 38 km distance is a good business for them. He can help you to get the luggage to taxi and out at the hotel in Changshu.
Option 2 is a little bit troublesome, since the PVG to the nearest shuttle station may be as far as Changshu to Suzhou, no to mention the burdern to get off taxi, onto bus, and off bus and on to taxi again... Also, it may not easy for you to find out bus station - bus station is not as easy to find in Shanghai as airport or train stations (as in any city)
Option 3 is the worst. Considering the time you spend in Shanghai - from one airport to the other airport, that takes about one hour. This distance is far longer than the Changshu-Suzhou distance. It won't save you money or time.
Hope this helps. Good luck!
终于看到Google中国黑板报上出现有意思的一篇了, 要是里面每个“勇者泡泡龙”都这样写就比较好玩, 最好还让他们市场部的mm们也扮扮泡泡龙。 不过那个力场算最短路径的算法似乎以前在VSLI的物理设计布局优化中就有人用到过, 并不是太异想天开。 我们的猛哥去年就用引力场斥力场来摆电路上的方块, 玩得也是很high。
这两天香港媒体大幅度报道一个新闻,那就是香港的几个药剂师协会组成联盟,要求政府医药分家,并且用这样的口号,准备参加年底的选举委员会选举,希望能够对选举产生特区行政长官产生影响力。他们认为,进行医药分家的说法已经讲了二十多年,但是却没有改善,而在最近六年,发生了多起配错药的事件,政府必须正视这个问题,建议一套安全用药制度,因为医药分家,可以让医生和药剂师相互监管,防止出现一方坐大的局面,保障患者的权益。
香港的公立医院事实上已经使医药分家,所有的药品都是由医管局统一采购,医生开处方,并不需要考虑药品的成本等问题,只需要开出认为最适合病人的药方就可以了,然后由药剂师来处理药方。药剂师并不是单纯的按照医生的处方,而是需要根据自己的专业经验,来判断药品的使用品种和药量的准确性。不过在私家医院,病人可以用到怎样的药品,则是要看医生开出怎样的处方,而私家医生在开处方的时候,往往会考虑到成本的问题,因为他们是各自直接向各大药厂购买药品。另外在私家医院,进行配药的主要是护士,只有很少人才经受过专业训练,正是因为这样,才发生了配错药的事件。
主张尽快医药分家的人士认为,医药分家在西方已经有几十年的历史,而且已经被证明是能够保障患者的最好的办法,病人可以根据医生的处方,然后到药房,让药剂师配药,当然现在在香港还有一个问题,那就是并不是所有的药方都有药剂师,所以这些人士还提出,政府应该只允许药剂师才能够当药房的股东。
说到医药分家,在内地也并不陌生,而且还是很多人认为的,解决目前药价虚高,老百姓看不起病的唯一办法。由于发改委已经完成了有关的咨询和听证工作,看来第十八次的药品价格调整方案马上就要出台,昨天请的学者和业内人士谈关于药价的问题,非常的有意思,因为两个人私交很好,但是在电视节目上的观点各异。焦点就是在医药分家的问题上。
业内人士指出,现在的制药企业,其实在多次的降价之后,利润并不是很高,因为为了让药品能够进入医院,中间环节支付了高昂的费用,要解决这样的问题,其实就应该让医院只有开处方的权利,让患者可以在药店自行购买,这样的话,才能够把目前医药行业的潜规则问题,真正的解决。
学者认为,在目前这样并不可行,因为政府对于公立医院的投入不足,如果医药分开,医院难以维持下去,在这样的情况下,医生只有通过开贵药来获得额外的收入,只有让便宜的好药慢慢消失,真正要解决这样的情况,就是政府必须建议一套完整的药典,列明医生处方的药品范围,同时增加对公立医院的投入,增加医生的收入,让医生的收入和医院的利润分割,才能够真正使得患者得到好处。
尽管两个人在这个问题上看法不同,但是有一点,对于发改委过去十七次的降价措施,都认为,出发点是好的,但是效果几乎没有。这是因为政府的措施,并没有触及到医药销售行业的本质问题,所以不管是企业,还是医院,都有应对的措施,并且在政府的措施下,名正言顺地获取最大利益。
有消息指,这次的措施和以往不同,那就是,药品价格有升有降,避免企业为了利润而使得一些好药从医院消失。而目前发改委的药品监管中心也已经成立,只是学者也好,业内人士也好,都担心,那麽多的药,发改委管得过来吗?说到药品多,药检部门的绿色通道,让原本需要六到十年审批过程的新药,往往可以一年完成,这使得不少制药企业,把被列为降价的药品重新包装审批,到头来,付出高药价的,还是患者。
聊完药价,聊聊赖昌星,最新收到的消息,这个星期应该不会引渡他,可能还需要二个月的时间,还是因为加拿大法律程序上的问题。不过现在还没有被官方证实,明天白天,大家应该有最准确的消息了。当然我希望自己收到的这个消息是不准确的,只是,在法律制度越是完善的地方,因为程序而出现的这样的情况,也可能发生,这是必须接受的事实。今天公安部和外交部都谈到了这个案件,因为是召开记者会,所以对于记者的提问肯定早有准备,再次表示了政府的决心。
今天香港发生了一件事情,看来要炒一个星期,两名在深圳采访的电视台记者,在拍摄进行PAAG隆胸手术的一家美容医院的时候(PAAG已经被中国政府禁止在医院使用,但是美容医院由于没有监管,所以走了灰色地带,不少女性在手术后出现后遗症,包括五十多名香港女性),被院方的人痛打,结果记者目前在香港的医院验伤,而新闻片在香港的电视台播出后,深圳市市长要亲自发出声明进行回应。
不过香港的记者算是幸运,至少可以找特区政府救助,有香港记者协会撑腰,因为涉及到香港人,内地的地方政府必须回应,如果是内地同行,很多时候在采访的时候遭遇到恶劣的对待,结果可能就完全不一样了。