We have been talking about our plugin for web services for a couple months now. We call it FeedFlare, and we've already released a small default catalog of FeedFlare units that publishers can include in their feeds and on their sites. FeedFlare has been the fastest growing service in the brief history of FeedBurner, with over 10,000 feeds already using the service. The really big idea, however, was always the notion of providing a universal framework/API to enable any third-party web service to integrate with a publisher's content, without concern over what content management system the publisher is using.
Today, in conjunction with the Future of Web Apps conference in London, we are releasing the complete version 1.0 FeedFlare API and associated documentation. Any FeedFlare "unit" built according to these specs can now be incorporated by any publisher using FeedBurner. This post is long on technology details (and the documentation is longer on them still!), so if angle brackets test your will, now would be a good time to skip to the FeedFlare for Publishers section below.
Developer API Details
To provide an introduction to this API for all the interested developers out there, we have created the FeedFlare API Developer Guide. Of course, there are questions, and of course, we'll have answers. Please visit the new FeedBurner for Developers support forums specifically for developers with questions about, you guessed it, the FeedFlare API. For blitting issues, please seek other counsel.
Being the initial release, you'll find that the API is a little light on diagnostic tools to assist development of these Flare units. Please look at these Tips for Testing and visit the support forum for any questions. We'll be listening to your feedback and expanding our toolkit for developers.
FeedFlare for Publishers
If you look at the FeedFlare service setup form on the Optimize tab for any of your feeds at FeedBurner, you can see that there are spaces for three "custom" Flares. Flares are identified by URLs, so if someone has developed a Flare unit that you want like to use in your feed or site, just enter the URL into one of these fields and check the Feed and/or Site checkboxes next to it. This form is a bit "rustic" right now: look for some significant improvements, including an expanded catalog, in the next couple of weeks.
One other note: as you're adding or removing Flare units from your feed, it may cause the items in your feed to show up as modified. Making Flare changes only apply to "future items" is another thing we'll address soon, but for now you may want to burn another version of your feed and experiment on that version until you have things the way you want it. Once you've got your FeedFlare service setup finalized, however, the items will not be marked as modified even as the information is updated in the individual Flares.
101 Flare Ideas
There are all manner of services that can be integrated into a page or feed of content with FeedFlare. We've compiled a list of “101 Flares for a Better Tomorrow” that developers or companies could build. As Flares are built and publishers adopt them, we will add some of these to a catalog we maintain in the publisher services dashboard.
As you look through the 101 ideas, some themes emerge. First, companies can build Flares for their own content! An organization with multiple properties, for example, might want a Flare that promotes content from other properties in their feed, or a company might want Flare that links to a "related posts" query that's internal to the company. Secondly, there are really two kinds of Flare: Action and Meta-Data.
We are really excited to provide this API to help integrate the worlds of content and web services. We think all the tools are here to make integration smooth and straightforward. Dive in and let us know what you think. Direct your questions and feedback to the FeedBurner for Developers support forum and we will be sure to respond and react as quickly as possible.
搜索引擎 | 搜索力指数 | 排名升降 | 份额 |
1. Baidu | 115798978 |
![]() |
60.39% |
2. Google | 26256854 |
![]() |
13.69% |
3. 3721 | 19696106 |
![]() |
10.27% |
4. Yahoo | 15352254 |
![]() |
8.01% |
5. 163 | 5661266 |
![]() |
2.95% |
6. Sogou | 3937382 |
![]() |
2.05% |
7. QQ | 2449338 |
![]() |
1.28% |
8. iAsk | 987022 |
![]() |
0.51% |
9. China | 763938 |
![]() |
0.40% |
10. Zhongsou | 395062 |
![]() |
0.21% |
11. Tom | 356362 |
![]() |
0.19% |
12. Sohu | 47518 |
![]() |
0.02% |
13. Yisou | 34546 |
![]() |
0.02% |
14. Sina | 134 |
![]() |
0.00% |
本周四(2月9号)晚上7点,在必思浓(博客吧)继续讨论搜索引擎。
主题是索引建立和更新的问题,同时会播放 bigtable 的录像。
讨论的问题为:
搜索引擎的分布索引的建立方法
难点在哪里?
大规模索引更新的问题和解决方案
什么是bigtable?
bigtable有什么用处?
If we're going to use this blog to promote good news, then we also need to use it to discuss our mistakes. We pride ourselves on being very entrepreneurial, and we pride ourselves on being open, democratic, and human, by which we mean that we let everybody attack projects and work in the manner they think best. Last night, we sent out an unsolicited email simultaneously to about 90 people who aren't FeedBurner publishers. It was wrong to send such a solicitation; both the tone and act of sending the note for this purpose was wrong. Obviously, sending unsolicited email is not our style.
Great companies have a culture that the people within the company can be proud of. Companies react to mistakes in two ways - either you can create lists of rules and regulations, or you can work hard to make sure everybody "gets" the culture and let people be more entrepreneurial. We prefer the latter approach because it's a lot more fun if it works. It's also far more stressful when it doesn't. We are very quick to promote our own success around here when we sign deals and work with great customers, so we have to look ourselves in the eye and challenge ourselves when we screw up.
If you were one of the 90 folks that received an unsolicited email from us last night, mea culpa. I know a bunch of you personally, which makes it all the more amusing....not amusing like a New Yorker cartoon, but rather, amusing as in "not funny".
an initiative created to make the public more aware about the amount of money going into military & the Pentagon in the US. the campaign used highly simplified & large-format bar, column & pie graphs as well as physical representations like the inflatable structure in order to communicate a small but important amount of information on a very large scale. [quantumlight.com, sagmeister.com & sagmeister.com]