This is rather a theoretical interest for me for now (what else to do Friday evening) , but I see how it can be used in current dual-licensed mixed open / closed source storage engines MySQL world.
So problem is:
Let’s keep MySQL aside for simplicity and imagine we have fully open-source GPLvX licensed “MoonOffice” software. MoonOffice uses libsupercompress library which also distributed under GPL, and provide two functions: “superCompressFile”, “superDecompressFile”. MoonOffice can be both statically or shared linked with this library. This all fine.
Now imagine one provides library libquickcompress, which is closed sourced, available only in binary formats .so and .la, but the license on it is “use it as you want, link it with whathever you want, distribute it as you want”. Of course library also exports two functions “superCompressFile”, “superDecompressFile”.
Now questions: can we link our GPLed “MoonOffice” with libquickcompress ? Can we distribute binary build of MoonOffce linked with libquickcompress ? What is license of final binary ?
May be it is simple question and answer is obvious, but I am not sure what is correct answer.
Entry posted by Vadim | One comment
Wille Faler has created an excellent list of best practices for building scalable and high performance systems. Here's a short summary of his points:
eMarketer的一篇报道“How Much Does YouTube Make?”,披露了6家分析公司对YouTube在2008、2009年的收入估计:
相关请继续看“数据显示谷歌每天在Youtube上烧掉165万美元” 。
/* 虽然被墙,看看收入数字无妨。如果Google每年在YouTube投7.53亿美元,同时独立用户3.75亿,那平摊到每个独立用户,一年也就2美元开支。烧钱太厉害,或收入太不厉害? */
五月 2009 | ||||||
一 | 二 | 三 | 四 | 五 | 六 | 日 |
1 | 2 | 3 | ||||
4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 |
11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 |
18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 |
25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 |